Binta Dibba, Muhammed Sillah and Sulayman Dampha
By Fatou Sillah
The Judiciary Officer’s and National Assembly Salary and Pension Bill has sparked heated discussions among lawmakers, civil society, and the public. This proposed legislation aims to increase the salaries, allowances, and pension benefits of judicial officers to enhance their working conditions and ensure the judiciary’s independence and efficiency.
Initially introduced in September 2023, the bill faced swift rejection by the National Assembly. Lawmakers raised concerns about its perceived generosity amidst the country’s economic challenges, advocating instead for prioritizing constitutional amendments and other pressing issues.
Supporters, such as Mai Fatty, leader of the Gambia Moral Congress, argue passionately for the bill, emphasizing its role in maintaining judicial independence and attracting skilled professionals to the judiciary. They cite successful precedents in Commonwealth nations where similar measures have bolstered judicial systems.
Critics, however, remain steadfast in their opposition, citing financial constraints and advocating for a broader review of public sector salaries. They argue that the judiciary should focus on legal reforms and operational efficiencies before seeking increased financial benefits.
Sulyman Dampha, PRO of Serekunda Market, voiced his concerns, suggesting that the government prioritize supporting agriculture over raising judiciary allowances.
“We are in the rainy season, and the farmers are complaining about fertilizers. They hope to get tractors for their farms, and all that requires resources. So, in my opinion, before passing these bills, they should help those developing and securing the country, like the police,” he said.
Binta Dibba, a market vendor, echoed similar sentiments, advocating for increased salaries for police officers rather than judges and lawmakers.
“In view of the country, we see that the National Members should be content and leave the rest of the resources to the poor, like the police and the nurses. The police have been doing a lot for the country, even here at the market,” she said.
Muhammed Sillah, another market vendor, expressed strong opposition to both bills.
“The country has done everything for the NAMs and the judges; they have cars and everything when the country needs help. Now they want us to give all our taxes to the NAMs, ministers, and judges. I am against the bills, and I will even join the youth in their next protest if possible.” He said.